Service · governed under the claims policy

Execution Admissibility Review

One execution path. One structured review. A JAS grade you can defend, findings mapped to the ontology, and the record templates to fix them.

JExec Check evaluates one declared execution, free, in your browser. A Review is the human-performed counterpart at path level: we walk one route by which your state gets mutated — a production deploy pipeline, an AI agent’s tool-execution loop, a data-migration process — through the full JExec model, as it actually operates rather than as it is declared.

What you receive

• A JAS grade for the path — A0–A3 against the Standard, with the specific requirements that set the level, so the grade is checkable rather than ceremonial.
• Findings mapped to the EAO — each failure identified by class (EAF-1…EAF-10), with the concrete site in your path where it lives and the remediation that closes it.
• A prioritized closure order — which findings to close first, priced by the protocol’s own severity logic, not by generic best-practice lists.
• Record templates — JExec Record structures pre-filled for your path’s executions, so declaration (A1) costs days, not quarters.

Scope and honesty

• A Review grades one path, not your organization. That is the only honest unit — see “Using the Standard honestly.”
• It is an assessment against a published specification, performed by its author — not a certification, and not a security audit. There is no JAS certificate, from us or anyone.
• The deliverable cites only the public, versioned spec, so your team can verify every finding against the same pages you are reading now.
• Fixed scope, fixed fee, agreed before work starts. No finding is softened or sharpened by the commercial relationship — the governance page makes that structural.

Who it is for

Teams putting agents into production and needing their tool-execution path to be defensible; platform teams whose deploy pipeline has grown gates nobody can enumerate; engineering leaders who need “are our mutations governed?” answered in a form auditors and boards can read.

Intake

Write to agent@sohadot.com with three sentences: the path you want reviewed, the actor types on it (human, CI, agent), and whether it touches production. You will receive a scope and fee before any commitment.

Review capacity is limited and queued; the reference layer of this site is maintained first. That ordering is the point.