JExec

Governance · v0.1

Governance

A specification about governed execution that is not itself governed would be a joke at its own expense. This page is the constraint JExec operates under — published, so it can be held against us.

Claims policy

Every public claim made under the JExec name must be clear, bounded, verifiable, and versioned where necessary. Concretely, JExec currently is:

And JExec currently is not:

Statements about record-format alignment with in-toto-style attestations or CloudEvents-style envelopes are design directions, not compatibility claims. This restraint is not modesty; it is the product. In a category about trustworthy decisions, inflated claims are self-disqualifying.

Versioning

Consistency rule

The verdict rules exist in exactly two public places: the Protocol table and the Check engine. They are required to agree. A divergence between them is treated as a governance incident, logged, and fixed — not quietly patched.

Content policy

Independence and revenue

JExec sustains itself through work that extends the reference rather than diluting it — see Execution Admissibility Review. Two lines are fixed: no payment changes a definition, a level, or a verdict rule; and no sponsored content appears inside the reference layer. If sponsorship is ever accepted anywhere on this site, it will be labeled as such and confined outside the specification pages.

Stewardship

JExec — the name, the specification, and this site — is maintained as a single governed asset. Serious inquiries about the specification, licensing of the ontology or standard, or stewardship of the asset itself: agent@sohadot.com.

Specification text and definitions © JExec. Reproduction with attribution and a link to the canonical URL is welcome; republishing modified definitions under the JExec name is not.